Shirky principle

The Shirky principle states that institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution. It is named for the writer and academic Clay Shirky, who articulated the observation in a 2010 blog post, though he attributed the underlying idea to a broader pattern noted by earlier critics of institutional behavior.

The principle describes a structural conflict of interest. An organization, department, or product that exists because of some problem has an incentive, often unconscious, to keep that problem from being fully solved, since a fully solved problem removes the reason for the institution’s continued existence and funding. This does not require deliberate bad faith. It emerges naturally from the fact that an institution’s staff, budget, and mission are all justified by reference to the problem it addresses, so solving the problem too completely is quietly self-defeating for everyone whose role depends on it persisting.

In software, the principle is invoked as a caution about teams, tools, or whole product lines built around managing a symptom rather than removing its root cause: a support team optimized around handling a high volume of recurring tickets rather than fixing the defect generating them, or a monitoring dashboard elaborated further each time it fails to prevent the outage it was meant to catch. It is related to Goodhart’s law in that both describe how an institution’s own incentives can quietly diverge from the outcome it is nominally there to produce.

See also

References